Fellow World Occupier :

Fellow World occupier
Jobless? Time to wonder why ? Too much work,
always producing more in less time ? Forced
into a cruel competition with co-workers, other
farmers or businessmen ? You ask yourself why
all that war and poverty ? You wonder why a
president or head of state can put the war
machine in action against the will of the
congress, parliament or the population ?
You wonder why a party leader against the
majority of his party members can go to war ?

Maybe you think ‘living and working in such
a world, that cannot be the meaning of life ?
Maybe you cannot see the sense of the work you
are doing…and you cannot find another job
easily ? You cannot find a political party or
trade union that offers you a larger picture
of the global situation or solutions …or the
ones who real have a valuable opposition
seem to be acting apart from each other ?

You think that the official education system
doesn’t focus enough on all those problems
and offers no accurate explanation about
politics and daily life ? Your social and
personal relations do not benefit from all
these circumstances. You are fed up seeing
certain TV programs, reading some kind of
newspapers or you want to stop with certain
habits that make your life more negative ?
You want to do something about this,
starting with yourself.

You realize that a human being is not a robot
designed to work and you want to come up
for yourself and others; because of the fact
that the same difficulties arise in other
families, with other people in other countries
and working units…the same questions seem
to touch others in a more awful way, depending
on where one lives.

You don’t need a drug any more to get away
from it all. You know that being obsessed to
much with negative emotions and with
wanting to buy too much stuff can attack
your objective judgment and criticism,
even your inner evolution as the unique
soul you are.

In short, you are conscious about a number
of things that keep you away from developing
a broader consciousness and you realize that
you need fellow-thinkers to put all that
consciousness in a growing number of people
and action. You can make a conscious choice.
You do want to get involved in making this a
better world without war and poverty and more
real happiness, less pollution of all kind .
You want a world with less stress at work and
at home, more time for reading about the rest
of the world and all kind of thing, more time
for cultural things .

We can experience life in a more complete way.
No ordinary idiot entertainment based on
sensation with too little inner content.
No more shows where there is being taught
how to eliminate others in order to see some
individual run away with the big money…
in order to teach us that such attitudes ought
to be our way of life. No false divisions based
on race, nationality, religion or economical power.
No more that terrible amount of publicity on our
TV screens. No more that economical way of life
that says ‘buy more or there will be an
economical crises’. No more war because i
t provides jobs…no should that business down
internationally, no more arms production
and arms trade. Only police should be armed.
No more media using a part of the truth
mixed with lies. No more misuse of the values
behind words as socialism, god, religion,
philosophy …in order to keep the system of
speculating with money and material values
in place.

It is not the intention of world history to keep
the evil that is being promoted in place.
Vote for a change, yes you can vote for a
political program yourself before in a second
round you can vote for the ones having
to implicate and control it. You can vote
on project lists instead of party lists.
Participate on a worldwide referendum :

Go to http://www.bloggen.be/conscience2008
philosophical resistance octo

Advertisements

February 7, 2010. politics. 2 comments.

C.O.N.S.C.I.E.N.S.C.E.presents it’s referendum program (in English-French-Dutch)

C.O.N.S.C.I.E.N.C.E. , the Committee for New Simultaneous International Elections ,Necessary to Create more Equality
PROPOSES YOU TO VOTE ON
A COLLECTIVE ALTERNATIVE ____________________________________________________
PEOPLE’s DATA STANDARDS
SUPPOSE ‘MONEY’ WOULD only BE SOMETHING TO HELP US COUNT INSTEAD OF SPECULATE, then some paintings wouldn’t be as expensive as building houses and feeding
thousands of poor people.
SUPPOSE all STATES , FIRMS AND COMPANIES WORLDWIDE;
WOULD PAY EVERYONE THE SAME MONEY FOR THE SAME WORK : a minimum amount THAT IN AN ECOLOGICAL WAY PROVIDES IN EVERYTHING MODERN LIFE HAS TO OFFER.
SUPPOSE TEACHERS WORLDWIDE DON’T teach more than ten pupils each class and carbuilders would refuse to much flexibility.
Suppose THAT ALL MATERIALS, GROUNDS, GOODS and services HAVE A GLOBAL STANDARDISED PRICE expressed in one single worldcurrency.
SUPPOSE EVERYBODY WHO DOESN’T WORK IN A SOLIDARY WAY RECEIVES LESS.
(except really sick people)
SUPPOSE EVERYONE’s ADMINISTRATION IS BEING DEALTH WITH IN one way :
EACH ONE NUMBER, ENLARGED WITH 3 LETTERS THAT CONNECT THE PERSON WITH ONE OF THE 15 PROJECTS IN LIVE :
FOOd / HOUsing / WORk / SECurity/ HEAlth/ EDUcation/ ENErgy/ PROduction / DIStribution/
TRAnsport / ENVironment/ MONey/ TELecommunication/ SOCiety / RELations/
SUPPOSE EVERY PUBLIC SERVICE IS BEING PAYED BY AN EQUAL CONTRIBUTION OF EVERYBODY (once a month automatically taken from our wage
, before we get it) , a system that would make public transport and the highways of
telecommunication accessible for everyone , a system that if there already only was more social maturity, could be used in other areas too ( goods or certain services) .
SUPPOSE WE WOULD UNITE AND PUT FORWARD OUR PROGRAM ON ALL 15 PROJECTS AND HAVE A WORLDWIDE ELECTION ON IT …BEFORE WE ORGANISE WORLDWIDE ELECTIONS AS TO PUT IN CHARGE THE LOCAL, PROVINCIAL , CONTINENTAL AND WORLDWIDE DIRIGENTS OF EACH PROJECT.
SUPPOSE THE QUALITY OF LIFE BECAME MORE IMPORTANT THEN A LOT OF BUREAUCRATIC AND COMMERCIAL STUPIDITY…suppose we all learned to become aware of our real consciousness that looks to enrichen itself by means of our collective and individual history.
Let us first give some motivation for each of the projects and let us add a first list of our demands on each project before we compose some standard files or start constructing the election file on our demands so far as the program itself is concerned.
________C.ON.S.I.E.N.C.E. _________________________
COMMITTEE FOR NEW SIMULTANEOUS INTERNATIONAL ELECTIONS, NECESSARY TO CREATE MORE EQUALITY
______________________________________________________________________________
PRESENTS THE 15 PRO.CO.C.I.T. – PROJECTS
PRODUCERS CONSUMERS COLLECTIVIZE INTERNATIONALIZE TELEMATISIZE_:::::each person and company or institution…will administratively belong to one of the fifteen projects. ::::::each consumer has his place (number)in one of the projects and their sectors…. _____________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
P R O J E C T W O R K
_______________________________________
—-MOTIVATION : A LOT OF PEOPLE EXPERIENCE THEIR WORK AS BORING BECAUSE THE TOTALLY FREE MARKET DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH WELLPAYED JOBS FOR THEM.
HAVING A JOB STILL IS NOT A RIGHT FOR EVERYBODY. WORKING-PEOPLE CANNOT CHANGE EASILY TO A NEW JOB BECAUSE OF THE SCARCITY OF JOBS.
IN A NEW INTERNATIONALLY ORGANIZED AND STANDARDIZED ECONOMY, COMPETIVITY WILL NOT BE BASED ON EXPLOITATION ANY MORE, BECAUSE ALL PRICES AND PRODUCTION CONDITIONS WILL BE STANDARDIZED.
THE HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATIONS OF FIRMS AND INSTITUTIONS
MUST WORK WITH TOO MUCH DIFFERENT BUREAUCRATIC REGLEMENTS AND STATUTES.
THERE IS A LOT OF WORK AHEAD IF WE WANT TO STANDARDIZE THESE TOOLS IN OUR COMPAGNIES ,WHILE WE WILL START WORKING ON ADMINISTRATIVE UNIFICATION.
—–DEMANDS : PEOPLE WORKING IN HUMAN RESOURCES SHOULD CREATE INTERNATIONAL DATA TO WORK WITH , on the folowing bases :
° SAME WORK SAME PAY ° LESS DIFFERENCE IN PAY ( 1/2 maximum difference)
°INDIVIDUAL PREMIUM OR INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION SHOULD BE WELL
ORGANISED ON AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE MEASURABLE OBJECTIV RESULTS
°PEOPLE WHO STUDY SHOULD HAVE AN INCOME
°EVERYBODY SHOULD BE ABLE TO WORK WITHIN REASONABLE DISTANCE OF HIS WORK
° …
project t e l e m a t i c s
—-MOTIVATION : THERE IS T MUCH ANARCHY IN THE USE OF THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
IN TELEMATICS , THE REAL POSSIBILITIES ARE COMMERCIALIZED.
——-DEMANDS : ° CREATION OF A TELEMATIC UNIVERSAL MANAGMENT SYSTEM (T.U.M.S.)
A SYSTEM TO BE USED IN EVERYTHING THAT HAS TO DO WITH ORGANISATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE MANAGMENT OF THE PROJECTS AND THEIR SECTORS…
IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO CONTROLE AND COORDINATE, each GOUVERNEMENT AND EACH
MANAGMENT SHOULD USE THE SAME TUMS-system…to know about how many people ? where ?
Who ? what ? how much ? when ?…
° TUMS SHOULD BECOME A PROJECT TO INTEGRATE THE 15 PROJECTS
AND MANAGE THE SUPERSTRUCTURE OF MODERN AND FUTURE TELEMATICS.
IN ORDER TO DO SO COMPANIES DEALING WITH HARD& SOFTWARE SHOULD UNITE TO CONSTRUCT ONE standardizedTUMS-plan, in stead of purchasing silly competition games.
°massproduction of a MULTIFUNCTIONAL TELETERMINAL
°
project t r a n s p o r t
——MOTIVATION : TO STOP POLLUTION SINCERELY SOMETHING DRASTIC MUST BE DONE
____DEMANDS : ° FREE PUBLIC TRANSPORT mainly in the cities (payed by small equal contrib.)
°
project s e c u r i t y
—–MOTIVATION : CRIMERATES , traffic AND WARS ARE KILLING AND SICKENING
—-DEMANDS : °MORE SOCIAL JUSTICE IS LESS CRIME AND WAR
°RECONVERSION OF WAR-ECONOMY
°ARMIES SHOULD INTERNATIONALLY BE USED AS FORCES THAT HELP
WITH NATURE-DISASTERS, BUILDING DIKES,,. helping fire -departement…
°CREATION OF ONE POLICE FORCE FOR EACH KIND OF CRIME.(one data)
°INTERNATIONALLY CONTROLED DESTRUCTION OF WEAPONS for war
°TRAFFIC POLICE COULD USE SOME HELP WHEN THERE IS NO MORE ‘work’
IN THE ARMY
project p r o d u c t i o n
—–MOTIVATION : INSTEAD OF MOVING TOWARDS COOPERATION THERE ARE WARS GOING
ON BETWEEN COMPANIES: THE VICTIMS ARE THE DISMISSED AND THE
PEOPLE AND FAMILIES WITH TOO MUCH STRESS
____DEMANDS : °MANAGERS SHOULD CREATE WORLDWIDE FILES CONCERNING
PRODUCTION/ STOCKAGE/PRODUCERS/ PRICES/DISTRIBUTION/
TRANSPORT…for each single product or raw material
°IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO DO SO THEY SHOULD UNITE
ORGANISATIONALLY IN FUNCTION OF THE PRODUCT THEY MAKE
°NO MORE WASTE-ECONOMY :replacing and saving paper, wood…
project d i s t r i b u t i o n
—–MOTIVATION : different prices kill jobs alsO
___DEMANDS : °SAME PRICES WORLDWIDE MORE JOBS IN BIG STORES
°EQUAL PRICES FOR SERVICES __FREE PROFESSIONS…
project h o u s i n g
—–MOTIVATION : MILLIONS LIVE IN TERRIBLE HOUSING -CONDITIONS OR PAY TO
MUCH RENT
___DEMANDS :
°INVENTARISATION OF HOUSES/ NEEDED HOUSES/ HOUSES TO BE REPAIRED/
HOUSES TO BE BUILD/ …in order to be able to do so once again all kinds of firms dealing with housing
, renting, building…should be obliged to join their information if they don’t discover the benefits earlier.
°STOP SPECULATION …why not a law that says that if you own more then one house you are obliged to sell it, in stead of renting it…why not then consider the rent as a pay of on long term ?
°MORE NATURE IN THE CITIES (for example farms for children…)
°ONE INTERNATIONAL RENTING PRICE
°
project h e a l t h
—MOTIVATION : THE HEALTH OF SOME ANIMALS SEEMS TO BE MORE IMPORTANT THEN THE HEALTH OF MILIONS OF PEOPLE WHILE THE WEST TAKES TOO MANY DRUGGS INSTEAD OF EXAMENING THE INFLUENCE OF STRESS AT WORK OR THE INNER AND OUTER RELATIONSHIPS OF THE HUMAN BEING AND ALL HIS SUBJECTIVE NEEDS.
—DEMANDS : °BETTER NOURISHMENT /HEALTH CARE IN THE THIRD WORLD
°More natural forms of healing, less anti-biotics…
°One equal anual contribution to pay for health-service (no more bureaucracy of ‘getting your
money back’)
°Birth Control Program
project f o o d
—MOTIVATION : THE OLD SYSTEM INVENTS LAWS TO THROW FOOD AWAY AND TO FORBID PRODUCTION WHILE MILLIONS STARVE
__DEMANDS : °HELP- PROGRAMS FOR POOR FARMERS EVERYWHERE
(why not organised by the farmers and the tool-making industry here ?)
project e n v i r o n m e n t
—-MOTIVATION : YOU KNOW WE WILL HAVE TO LIMITE POLLUTION…if not…
—-DEMANDS : °RECYCLING STARTS WITH SORTING THE CARBAGE
°also look for measures in other projects (transport…)
°MORE NATURE…
°PROTECTING ANIMALS
°hundreds of other measures
project e d u c a t i o n
—–MOTIVATION : GOUVERNEMENTS CUT ON EDUCATION TO SAVE THEIR BUDGET
/TEACHING HISTORY , FILOSOPHY AND PSHYCHOLOGY FEW TEACHERS
ARE REALLY CAPABLE OF THESE DAYS
___DEMANDS °CLOSER LINKS BETWEEN PROFESSION AND SCHOOL

°LESS PUPILS IN THE CLASSES (not more then ten is a good start)
°LINKS BETWEEN THE PROJECTS WORK (human resources firms or human
resources parts of compagnies ) and THE PROJECT EDUCATION
and links also to the educational projects ( exams, …) in other projects
°A LOT OF ATTENTION SHOULD GO TO THE PROJECTS PRESS AND
CULTURE THAT COULD BE INTEGRATED UNDER THE PROJECT
EDUCATION (why not separate nets for each kind of film, for documentaries…)
Project e n e r g y
—–MOTIVATION : NOT ENOUGH EFFORTS ARE BEING MADE TO SAVE OR PRODUCE ENERGY
___DEMANDS °INVESTING IN ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF GAINING ELECTRICITY
°INVESTING IN EDUCATING IN SAVING
project m o n e y
—MOTIVATION : THE SPECULATIVE ASPECT OF MONEY MUST DISSAPEAR
_DEMANDS : °see PEOPLE’s DATA(suppose…)
°SIMPLE CONTRIBUTION FOR INSURANCE
Project s o c i e t y (political managment)
MOTIVATION : WILL THE ‘LAST ONES’ BE THE FIRST ONES IN HISTORY ? THE WORLD WAS ALWAYS RULED BY THE ONES WHO HELD THE ECONOMICAL POWER… IT WERE ALWAYS THE POWER-ATTEMPTS OF THE LAWER CLASSES THAT PUSHED history IN NEW DIRECTIONS : the ones who owned the land, the money, the means of production decided and still decide most of the time. DECISSIONS ON WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO HAVE A JOB OR ABOUT HUNGER AND WARSPENDING AND ENVIRONMENT SHOULDN’ T BE TAKEN IN FUNCTION OF SPECULATION. TO MANNY PARTYMEMBERS OBEY THE money -minded SPECULATORS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THEIR PARTY. UNION MEN MAINLY FIGHT FOR PARTIAL PROBLEMS AND AREN’ T encouraged TO LOOK FOR GLOBAL SOLUTIONS AND ACTION…if they start doing so they are mostly thrown out anyway . Only somethimes people really show that they aren’t afraid of change. Only some small groups try to organise those uprises…but they do not a collective alternative to manage society in an other way . Even if they have the same ideology, they stay divided because each group understands the historical background and future developments or the role from this or that group in society otherwise. IF THIS INTRESTS YOU …LET US KNOW.
DEMANDS :
° ALL THE DEMANDS IN ‘PEOPLE’ S DATA’ and THE DEMANDS OF THE PROJECTS AND A
WORLD -WIDE REFERENDUM ON THIS, starting behind our pc’s, in our pubs , reunions, companies…
°IF ALL THIS CANNOT FIND HIS EXPRESSION IN THE CLASSICAL DEMOCRACY WE ENHERITED FROM HISTORY AND WHO TRIES TO DIVIDE US IN SO MANY WAYS,
THIS MEANS IF POLITICIANS DO NOT LISTEN TO NECESSITIES THAT WILL IMPLEMENT
THEMSELVES ANY HOW…THEY WILL LOOSE THEIR JOB FOR A CHANGE.
°WHY COULD’t WE REPLACE THE OLD SYSTEM OF ELECTIONS BY A NEW ONE ?
Candidates for the local managment functions could present themselves on the lists of the projects, not on the list of the parties , except the list of the project ‘society’, where one still would be able to vote for the ones having to manage jurisdiction, adminstration of the population, notarial things (since politicians mainly are lawyers they would find themselves at home.
PROJECT-ELECTIONS WOULD REPLACE PARTY-ELECTIONS MOSTLY , and THE ONES ELECTED PROVINCIALLY COULD ELECT THE CONTINENTAL
GOVERNEMENT, who AT THE SAME TIME WOULD BE THE WORLD -GOVERNEMENT.
The local counsels should be attended by the controling committees from neighbourhood or compagnie.
But before we can have all this we must simply start with discussion- groups.
New ways of protesting will emerge and are emerging.
Project r e l a t i o n s
__MOTIVATION : THERE ARE A LOT OF OBJECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS AS WE CAN EXPERIENCE THEM IN ONE OF THE MENTIONED PROJECTS OF SOCIETY.
THOSE OBJECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS EVOLUATE IN A COLLECTIVE WAY JUST LIKE EACH HUMAN BEIING CAN EVOLUATE IN A PERSONAL WAY OF DEALING WITH THE SUBJECTIVE THINGS IN LIFE : AM I A NIHILISTE OR SOMEBODY WHO LIKES PHILOSOPHY , SCIENCE…, am I emotionally strong enough to have a good influence on those who surround me, however contradictory this good influence at first sight may seem ?
IN MANY CASES THE BEHAVIOUR and thought OF MEN REFLECTS THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE RULING CLASS . MUCH IN RELIGION AND SURELY IN NATIONALISM STILL PREFENDS US FROM GETTING CLOSER TO OUR COMMON ROOTS. WHY too much SPECULATE ABOUT LIFE AFTER DEAD, WHILE THERE ARE ENOUGH TASKS TO BE FOUND HERE .
Discovering why your life was and is and will be your life is much more interesting. ..it ‘s a rather personal voyage to wisdom. ANYWAY SCIENCE ALREADY PROVED ELECTRONS HAVE AN ETERNAL EXISTENCE…and because everything exists of electrons we will return to the elements we came from : the ever recomposing elements to be found in the earth, wind, light and fire…maybe even in the anti-matter …who nows ? All the elements together formed our spirit, that’s for sure .
____DEMANDS :
°LEARN TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOURSELF AND OTHERS
°LEARN TO READ AND WRITE AND DISTINGUISH THE POSITIVE FROM THE NEGATIVE EVEN IF THE NEGATIVE SOMETIMES CONTRIBUTES TO THE POSITIVE, the positive must lead.
°LEARN TO OBSERVE IN A VERY BALANCED WAY WHAT IS HAPPENING IN YOUR TOTAL EVIRONMENT.
°LEARN TO DEAL WITH NEGATIVE EMOTIONS
°LEARN TO ALWAYS KEEP ON WONDERING ABOUT THINGS AND PEOPLE LIKE YOU KEEP ON WONDERING ABOUT SOMEBODY YOU LOVE …everything and everybody can teach you how to make better choises…how to maintain your good vibrations better.
°LEARN TO TRUST ON THE POWER IN YOU AND TO SOMETIMES HELP OTHERS ONLY BY TRUSTING ON THEIR INNER ENERGY, not by doing something they ought to do..
°LEARN TO BE AND TALK HONNEST, also in it’s sometimes strange ways

LA LUTTE FINALE SE PREPARE CHAQUE JOUR…
future modèle de gestion de société
On doit restructurer la politique. C.O.N.S.C.I.E.N.S.C.E., le COmité pour des Nouveaux Elections Simultanés Nécessaire pour créer plus d’Egalité…vous propose de voter son :
alternative collective
Supposez l’argent serait quelque chose pour nous aider à calculer au lieu de spéculer…alors certains peintures ne seraient pas si chèr que construire des maisons pour des centaines de gens.
Supposez que chaque Etat et compagnie sur une échelle mondiale payerait le même salaire pour le même travail, une quantité qui offrait d’une façon écologique la possibilité à avoir une vie humaine.
Supposez que les enseigneurs mondiale pouvaient avir des classes de seulement dix personnes.
Supposez que tous les matériaux et services avaient une prix unique, exprimé dans une monnaie mondial. Supposez que l’administration de chacun et chaque firme serait traité d’une même façon : chacun un numéro de téléphone, élargit avec trois lettres qui donnent connection avec chaque des 15 projets de la société : NOUriture/MAIson/TRAvail/SECurité/EDUcation/ENErgy/PROduction/DIStribution/TRAnsport/
ENVironment/ARgent/TELecom/SOCiété/RELations
Supposez que chaque service publique est payé par une contibution égale de tout le monde(pris une fois par mois de notre salaire avant qu’on le touche) Un tel système un accès presque gratuit aux transports et télécommunication. Ce système pouvait être élargit à d’autres secteurs(produits et autres services) pourvu il existerait une maturité sociale très large.
Supposez qu’on nous organiserait et qu’on mettait notre collective à un aprouvenment internationale, avant qu’on organiserait le second tour de ses nouveaux éléctions pour élire les dirigents local, provincial , continental et mondiale des différents projets.
Supposez que la qualité de la vie deviendrait plus important que beaucoup de bureaucratie et de stupidité commerciale.
Supposez que qu’ondevenait conscient du fait que l’histoire nous pousse vers l’organisation d’un meilleur monde sans chomage, pauvreté, guerre, pollution…
Pour chacun des projets on va donner d’abor un peu de motivation et après on va posser nos demandes. Il faudra aussi déveloper un ‘site’ pour voter sur l’internet.

C.ON.S.I.E.N.C.E presente : les 15 projets
project travail
-motivation : beaucoup de gens trouvent leur boulot ennuyante parce que la marché libre ne donne pas asseze du travail/avoir du travail n’est pas encore un droit/on peut pas façillement changer son travail, parce qu’il y en a pas assez/ Dans un économy standardisé, le compétivité ne sera pas basé sur l’exploitation puisque les conditions seront les même pour tous. Les Resources Humaines, les administrations personnels travaillent encore avec trop de différents statuts et réglements. Il faudrait les simplifier et standardiser.
-demandes : LE DROIT SUR UN EMPLOI AVEC UN SENS/MEME TRAVAIL MEME SALAIRE/LES ETUDIANTS DOIVENT ETRE PAYE AUSSI/
project telecom
-motivatie : pour l’administration des projects les moyens technologique ne sont pas standardisés, l’internet est trop utilisés uniquement pour des raisons commerciales
-demandes : la création d’un Système Universel Telematique pour le Gestion des projects (TUMS)un système pour l’administration et organisation des projects. Pour coordiner et controler chaque gouvernemt et entreprise devait empoyer le même système.pour savoir qui veut quelle emploie et quoi et où, pour savoir le demande de tous les produits et services. La population pourrait mondiale suivre ces données. TUMS serait le project pour intégrer les 15 projects et le pour gerer le secteur telecom.
Une campagne d’alfabetisations devrait être organisée pour tout le monde.
project transport

-motovation :pour mettre fin à la polution, le transport publique doit devenir principale
-demandes : une petite taxe standardisé ferait le transport publique presque gratuit
project sécurité
-motivation : il y aurait moins de crime parce que tot le monde aura une emploie/ mettre un fin aux guerres
-demandes : abolition des guerres/ reconversion de l’industrie d’armement/les armées vont être utilisés pour aider en cas de désastres naturelles, grands tavaux publiques pour empecher ses désastres/
seulement la police a le droit de porter des armes
project production
-motivation : au lieu de colaborer, il ya de guerres entres les entreprises, les victimes en sont les chomeurs, les accidents de travails et les individus et familles avec trop de stress
-demandes : les gérants devraient utiliser le système TUMS pour rendre l’information de leur entreprises accesible pour tot le monde : stockage, prix, demandes de personnels… . Les producents devrraient se réunir par group de product. Des messures pour éviter le gaspilage et la pollution devraient être pris.
project distribution
-motivation : trop de spéculation
-demandes : même prix pour même produits ou service/ création des données télématique pour savoir ou se trouvent quels produits et lequel et le moyen de transports le plus éfficient
project maison
-motivation : des millions vivent dans des conditions inhumaines ou payent trop de loyer
-demandes : inventarisation des maisons nécessaires, à reparer, construire…/tarifs sociales, pas de spéculation
project nouriture
-motivation : le vieux système invente des lois pour détruire la nouriture pour des raisons spéculatives et promote parfois ne pas producer la nouriture
-demandes : de la nouriture pour tout le monde en unifiant tous les efforts d’agriculture sur une échelle mondiale/ tous ceux qui travaillent dans ce secteur doivent recevoir une salaire uniforme s’ils travaillent leur terrains bien
project milieu
-motivation : reduire la pollution
-demandes : pas de surconsumation/triage immondices/recyclage/transport publique/entretiens des parcs nature/lois pour protéger les annimaux/plus d’energie propre…
project enseignement
-motivation : ne pas épargner sur l’enseignement, les pays pauvres doivent avoir des conditions commes
dans les autres pays pour enseigner
-demandes : pas trop d’élèves dans une classe/plus d’attention aus sciences humaines : philosophie, histoire, psychologie…/plus d’échangement entre entreprises et l’enseignement/enseignement pour adultes aussi/enseignement doit aussi apprendre à interpreter les medias objectivement
project energie
-motivation : trop de gaspilage et pollution
-demandes : invester dans l’energie propre
project argent
-motivation : l’aspect spéculative a des conséquences désastreuse dans le monde
-demandes : uniquement utilisation administrative de l’argent/une monnaie mondiale avec la même valeur partout/les banques doivent s’unir

project gestion de la société
-motivation : les décisions sur qui a le droit de travailler ou guerre ou pas de guerre…sont toujours pris par l’élite politique. Les dirigents politique ne peuvent pas faire une politique qui va contre le program globale. Ceux qui prennent les décisions dans les parties politiques et les syndicats suivent toujours ce que les spéculants veulent . On tourne dans des petits rond au lieu de résoudre les problèmes sur d’une façon mondiale. Si on va suivre leur logique, cela voudrait dire qu’on dois tous aller travailler pour le salaire le plus bas du monde…leur capitalisme éfondrait vite alors. Ils existent des groupes qui veulent prendre une autre chemin, mais ils sont divisé sur l’interpétation de l’histoire et sur les tactiques à suivre et ils bordurent uniquement sur le bataille classique des syndicats : des bon salaires sans connection mondiale et alternative globale
-demandes : tous les demandes des autres projects/ organisation des éléctions alternatives sur internets ou pression des comités sur les gouvernements nationaux ou administrations communales ou syndicats/
propagande poutr un nouveau système d’éléctions internationale: d’abord pour une programme mondiale et après pour les dirigents. Pour neutraliser le boycot des grands speculateurs il y aura pas des nationalisations. Sur le project ‘gestion de la société’ on pourra elire les dirigents por la justice, pour l’administration de la population et le premier qui aura une fonction coordinative. Un jour les éléctions des dirigents de projects remplaceraient les élections classique et par project et province quelqu’n sera envoyé au gouvernement continentale. Le gouvernement continentale formerais le gouvernement mondiale. Principe de base pour organiser ces éléctions serait le nombre de habitants d’un province.
Les comités locale pourraient avoir des moyens de controle sur leurs communes et entreprises.
project relations
-motivation : on devrais apprendre à travailler sans la discipline qui impose le système ancien et on devait de plus près avoir un intérets pour les problèmes de le monde de nos jours
-demandes : accompagnement psychologique pour des problèmes subjectives entre les gens/
des medias objectives et indépendentes du capital spéculative
project santé
-motivation : de nos jours on utilise trop de médicaments, c’est mieux d’attaquer les sources des maladies comme la pollution, le stress, la culture commerciale, pas assez de contact avec la nature, tensions psycholgiques
-demandes : nouriture naturelle de bon qualité, établissement d’un infrastructure médicale dans les pays pauvres, des soins médicale pour tout le monde (petite contribution de tout le monde)
Plan d’action
Si la volonté et la nécessite pour discuter l’alternative collectiviste devient plus claire on peut commencer à inventer des actions. Organiser de la pression sur les mandataires politiques classique,
des arrêts de travails pour discuter l’alternative. Exiger du patronat qu’il paye les mêmes salaires dans les pays pauvres… . Des manifestations pour exiger des Nations Unis l’abolition des guerres et de la pauvreté en imposant les demandes de l’alternative collective. Tous les premiers des différents gouvernements doivent avoir un réunion pour aux moins interdire toute spéculation dans l’économie, même salaire pour le même travail, reconversion de l’industrie militaire, etc…
octo

February 6, 2010. Tags: , , , , , , , . politics. Leave a comment.

lessons from history (texts resulting in http://bloggen.be/conscience2008 -referendum)

LESSONS FROM HISTORY
———————————————————————————————
Why don’t we put forward our own program first ?
Why don’t we defend our own alternative in the enterprises we work ?
Why don’t we invite the jobless to join our reunions ?
Why don’t we develop our new strategy to put our demands in power ?

Can lessons from class-struggle become descisive ?
Words must be used correctly,otherwise you get unnecessary misunderstandings. For example ‘communism’ is a system that is based on the collective ownership of the means of production an distribution ,in function of the most simple administration and without a salary system or commodity-production(no prices,no pay), a system that replaces the conditions unther which we work unther capitalism ore state-capitalism. Such a system didn’t ever exist (or in a primitiv way maybe). Attempts to establish such a system have always been answered with arms or with technical and burocratic sabotage from groups who where afraid of losing their benefits. And what is ‘socialism’ then ? Is it a phase between capitalism and communism ? A certain degree of ‘nationalised’ economic property still based on salary and commodity production, with more serious prices for the goods?
What do they mean by improving ‘democracy’? Democracy means “the power of the people”. Unther ‘people’ you can understand as well the aristocracy(nobles), the bourgeoisie (the little group of enormously wealthy owners of big companies,banks… .) aswell as the ‘petit-bourgeoisie(owners of little firms, stateleaders, import.functions…)or even the small independants or the workers and farmers…if you understand this unther ‘people’ then maybe you think it’s normal that political power is divided between political parties and the very well paid parlement and coalition governements. That’s one way of putting it…but how about social and economical equality ?
Residents are not ‘citizens’ . ‘Citizens’ replaced the ruling aristocracies, thanks to the hunger-uprisings of the poor, who were not organised politically yet. If you understand with ‘people’, the ones having to sell their labour or the small independents struggling with monopoly-capitalism, then you are a proletarian and capitalism made you the strongest, (that is only in numbers) Who has the majority can rule. Why is there then so much social misery, war, exploitation ? Do collectivist want this then…or can we do without the devastating way capitalism tries to be progressif in ?
Why is capitalism socially a demoded system ?
What is the difference between ‘bourgeois’ and ‘collectivist’ democracy ? How should the last one be organised ?
Is it still a usefull tactic for collectivists to participate in elections ? Do the classical bourgeois parties represent the interests of the workers you think ? Aren’t fascism and bourgeois democracy just two complementary forms of ruling of the money-elite over the workers ? In which way also bourgeoisie can stay in power by using the analyses and programs of parties claiming to be workers-parties ? Can workers continue to struggle without a blueprint of their society in mind ? What do workers still understand from the lessons of the past and why are they trapped in the old bourgeois and proletarian way of thinking about history ?
How to do away with corporatism and develop solidarity
and how can a new proletarian culture replace the moneyguided circus our society is ? How to develop our consciousness about all this in dailly life ? Is working like slaves for anonymous shareholders estetically ,or hunger, or underdevelopment where the old system has no other answer to then war and further exploitation ?
Because words were and are so misused , let’s call us collectivists and not base us entirelly on one figure in proletarian history( for a collectivist alternative, read : http://filosofischverzet.skynetblogs.be
After reading this you will notice that a lot of arguments and discussions will lose their sense or get a solution :which ?: the ‘one’ ore the ‘more partysystem’/substitutionisme(the party rules in stead of the soviets)/entrisme(working as a little group, penetrating in other parties…to take over/ selfmanagment(within the capit.system/nationalisations/state-capitalism or not/alliances with national bourgeoisie or not/federalism-selfindependence/syndicalism/ particip.elec/…
By managing society unther non-capitalistic conditions the collectivist democracy can develop through the projects.
Collectivists who are in for this kind of revolution want to adress them to those getting tired of arguing about the mistakes of their great examples (this can be very interesting) but why is capitalism after so much time, still in power, still the ruling ideology ?
The history of working class looks like a war-saga, with different parties trying to take power, who succeed and then become attacked by capitalism or it’s collaborants in the very own proletarian circles. Most revolutionaries think that the alternative for power will emerge from the spontaneously to emerge councels, or from ‘democratic centralism’ in a proletarian vanguard-party. Realistically it cannot be otherwise or those traditionally wished ‘councels’ or central committees of the vanguard-parties will contain such differences in opinions and will be so infiltrated, that the mass of workers will not be able to orientate themselves : not anymore on the corporatistic demands of the State allied syndicats, not anymore on the left bourgeois-parties or not on those expecting miracles from the ‘democratic’ debate in the councils. Without alternative goals and a revolutionay workers-consciousness which stop ownership of the bigbusiness and the right to decide on financial issues as a non-worker, we will get no where, we will not no what to do.
Without managers and controlcommissions in the factories and companies, without local and internationally organised political dirigents and clear deals…we will obtain no control.
Almost all strikes and initiatives collaps without global alternativ. Revolutionaries these days put their hope on the collapse of capitalism, on a purely ‘asking for more money’ or less time to work, without seeing capitalisms real condition the last hundred years. Capitalism has tied workers in a hundred ways, why shouldn’t workers put forward their maximum demands ? We are the youngest class in history…can we take power while letting capitalism survive ?
When will ‘the last ones’ finally become ‘the first ones’?
Each group in proletarian history has had it’s benifits and mistakes that were bound to happen because of the circumstances of time and space, burocracy, privileges…
The utopist tried it on a small scale. Marx and Engels showed that living conditions and not so much great personalities make history and got in the clinch with peolple like Bakoenin who saw revolution rather more as an imediate coup, who could not be lead by a massparty, but by a group of maybe hundred revolutionaries, spreaded over Europe, infiltrating everywhere, to take over the’ autority'(hmm) from aswell the bourgeois organisations as the Internation Workers Association and put it in the hands of his Alliance.(he did not succeed) Seventeen years after the end of the Intern.Workers Assoc. The massparties that grew unther the rise of soc.democracy established the Social.Int (second 1889)
In 1914 when the great majority of german soc democ. aproved the funds to fight the war , communists left it to establish the third int.
The councels who for the first time in history emerged on the scene , got a second change in 1917. The bolsjevics helped to fight the councels theoretically and practically against the old parlementary and aristiocrat influences. After the revolution 14 foreign armies attacked the young Russian republic which had to be build again from practically zero.
In Germany after world war one ,a revolution which was ended by the military forces with the aid of soc.democrats ‘showing themselves as revolutionaries’ paved the way for the succes of a big noise with a little moustach . Despite the electoral succes of the KomPartei Deut, KAPD,…the skinny painter supported by the bourgeoisie would win, because he got the money to create a bit of jobs by means of state-capitalism (armsproduction, roads…)to gain support.
Few people understood that capitalism needed war to survive. In the mean while a Georgian fellow lead a big heavy industrialisation proces which helped to beat nazism.
He lead a party that was much based on burocracy and strategical deals with the fully capitalist countries and stopped the emancipational proces in the councels. Necessary from a military viewpoint or not in those days…to many wanted a more-party system for their own reasons, that’s for sure !?
Ownership became less private ,but the production relations did not alter (still salaries, commodities) so it was not really a system you could call ‘communist’…it was a social experiment unther terrible conditions; an economy of trying to survive, while the world got on fire once more. The experiment couldn’t concurate with the purely capitalist states who had accumulated money to start again once more thanks to war-benefits, and the urss degenerated in the direction of revisionism ( reconciliation of capitalists and reformists) As a consequence : the economy of a part of the east, became a hunting ground again for western capitalism.
Next time some viewpoints of different vanguard-parties, which illustrate all this.
As it comes to butchering working class, all States know how to divide the work between them . We saw it in Spain in the civil war, in Italy some years later… Very ‘honourable’? men like Churchill for example commanded the bombing of Dresden, a town with no strategical value…but filled with deserteurs and revol.workers at the time… and who ordered to drop some atomic bombs when Japan was already defeated?

In imperialist wars, workers SHOULD not choose the side of one of the fighting states, they make revolution in their own country, OR should not listen if they are told to disarm (like in Italy-strikes of 1943- where once again like in Spain, communists would join a ‘governement of national unity’ that obeyed the currents who saved capitalism)Were these results the maximum that was pooosible those days ?
They would next time better listen to the left part of those claiming to represent them…and who know that ‘Stalinists’ as well as ‘Trotsky’ as others made -‘mistakes’-(but was really possible unther those circumstances ?)
where they are trying to learn from.
Maybe collectivists can discover a way of avoiding civil war when they work out new tactics of preventing imperialist war … and changing society more peacefully.
Some other s u b j e c t i v e problems (not so organisational)
———————————————————————
Promoting consciouness remains a difficult task in these days, but as Marx so geniously explained, the objectiv situation (econ.crisis)is on our side… the most difficult part remain the subjective living conditions that determine our ideological links with the ruling class. To this we can also add the emotional, and physchological living conditions or the bourgeois spirituals that claim a monopoly on ‘spiritual-live’…as if materialists do not have a vision on this…an eternal one…as eternal as the life of the electrons out of which everything that exists exists. The media then…another obstacle :can we find a way in which on a large scale we can promote the idea that we are beeing told a lot of lies and rubbish ?
Not all is against us dough. In my spare time I visited let’s say about 25000 political homepages on the net .
The left is far more better represented then the right.
Very easily (one recognises the crab from the titles of the pages) I found about a 1000 groups or individuals who took my attention and I mailed about 400 of them, getting some 200 mails or visits of the collectivist homepage back)
Let’s hope more and more young people or older, unemployed or not will start digging into their collectivist past and discover that they hold the key to the future of a better world. Let’s hope afterwards they start thinking about uniting to discuss what can be done. Let’s hope their numbers will have grown on the decisive moments. Let’s hope the old rulers won’t be able to let us go and fight the workers of other countries no more…in the mean time they manage to do this on an economical level…we even fight the workers on our own factory floor, …some of us are put in anger because they haven’t got jobs and others do…another easy victory for capitalism. Every fight against our family, friends or lover(s) is energy that cannot be used against our real exploiters… so find your inner calm and resolve your relation problems in a human way : try to become emotionaly strong, because we have a whole new kind of other world to win…a world in which we will be able to discover the neverending story of your consiousness that tries to enrichen itself before the ‘corpus’, this ‘germ’ dies and leaves its fruits… Start observing your world today with other eyes and find out how it works, intervene, come up for the rights of your class, don’t capitulate, find out when best to retreat, or which is a good tactic. Share your impressions. Educate yourselves and others. Think before you speak, when you get carried away by your blood.
Do not lose your sense of humour, it will help you to learn how to be patient…every process takes it’s own time, when you are ahead , you know this can sometimes be a handicap to you as well as a privilege.
Learn how to counter statements your fellowmen read or heard in the bourgeois controlled media.
Learn to talk in public. If you are afraid to act, those thaughts will grow and you will even be more afraid afterwards.
Overcome your inner barriers, discover the undiscovered part of yourself. Live is more than acting and thinking as robots.
Live was not meant to be lived as to much of us live it today.
If we do not improve certain situations things will get worse for us all. For those without seeing the problems : more States posess atombic bombs; each day unemployment and war dominate the news, increasing exploitation tries to save capitalism but problems are getting bigger. Please start thinking and acting.

Read also the folowing articles :OPAA : Octo’s Politcal Analyses & Alternatives ,(a musical cd ‘present stage of the world’ with lyrics from this texts and music by Frank Lano.was made, based on this text-8 songs)
+++THE IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING AN IDEOLOGICAL METHOD
+++MATURITY COULD CHANGE THE WORLD
+++REVOLUTIONS SO FAR WERE OF A REFORMIST NATURE
+++A CHANGE IN ATTITUDE
+++LES RELATIONS HUMAINES OBJECTIVES
+++PROLETARIAN ADMINISTRATIAN AND HIERARCHY VERSUS BOURGEOIS STATE AND BOURGEOIS DEMOCRACY
+++LA LUTTE FINALE SE PREPARE CHAQUE JOUR

OPAA : Octo’s Politcal Analyses & Alternatives

+++THE IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING AN IDEOLOGICAL METHOD
An ideology is a way to understand life and it’s different practical an theoretical meanings. Consciousness is born each time practical experiences ead to theoretical tinking and result in orientating and acting in an adapted way. Political history gives us much exemples of this. Sometimes only reforms are possible. Sometimes revolutionary reforms are beiing pushed by circumstances… a real revolution shall become possible when the global picture of circumstances is understood by a more interdisciplinary and worldwide orientated consciuosness. The same laws that guide history also can be found in our own emotional, pshychological and intelectual development and even in some relationships we encounter.
Consciousness is born out of matter, like theory is born out of practice.
If theories are not based on practice, we call them fantasies, which can be nice or dangerous or both. We call this ‘idealism’, it leads to confusion because it’s no longer ‘materialism’. Sometimes illusions are necessary to get back on the road of reality. Both in social as in personal life.
The theoretical way to understand life, is studying all the existing rational, objective sciences and combining them with the more subjective sciences and inject the result into practical life. The subjective sciencess depend on the objective ones because without ‘matter’ there can be no consciousness. At the same time the hierarchical weight of the subjective prevents the objective laws to impose them self on the general evolution of society and the human beiing…but this is always a temporary proces. An ideology is a way to understand both the history and present stage of the world and it’s consequences on global living conditions.
However great some existing differences in exploitation might be, capitalisitic ideology also tneds to evoluate in the direction of socialst ideology…because the foundation for a worldeconomy and the way to manage it by modern technical means, still increase…this shall be an advantage once proletarians shall reunite in an effective and revolutionary way. And they shall, because the capitalistic inner contradictions that
scientific socialism pointed out, still seem to remain unsolvable. But nobodyholds a cristal ball, so let’s not insult each other if we have different opions on the economical strength of capitalism.
Important to remember is that a decreasing economy leads to a weakening of the ideology of the ruling class…at least if the oppressed class is not beaten fysically or brought to poverty…or has to little class consciousness left. The first task of the most conscious human beiings with an orientation towards proletarian ideology, must be to understand these proceses of evolution. Ones they do, they must present a global and general program of managing society and experiencing life in a different way. Theoretical explanations should correspond with the practical conditions they try to explain…but they should try to always be one step ahead.
Feodal ideology, with the aristocracy as it’s ruling class, based it’s power on an unclear concept of ‘God’,(and not on the eternal forces of nature who produced and developed consciousness) and mainly on the ownership of land and consequently economical and military power.
While all kind of historical facts happened according to changing living conditions and while the bourgeois rulers of the capitalist system used the proletarian discontent to take power from the nobles, they started developing the means of production and the production forces. The world was (and still is) forged and forced together in a very unethical way : wars, famine, unemployment, eclogical disasters, exploitation).
Capitalist ideology based it’s power mainly on the private ownership of the means of production, on the production of commodities, trade and a wagesystem…while in theory the really socialsist thinkers of the last 150 years wanted to abolish these bourgeois-based things; in practice they had to be satisfied with all kind of economical, social ande political reforms that nowadays lead to a degree of wealth for only a limited number of workers. While in theory the socialist thinkers wanted communism, they saw State-Capitalism beiing established; while they wanted to abolish the State, they saw it beiing transformed in a continously strengthened apparatus in function of bourgeois ideology.
While they looked for unity amongst proletarians, they got divided on theoretical and practical or even personal bases. While reformism helped survive capitalism and the final technical revolution is now taking place and the world becomes more and more a global private company…it SEEMS bourgeois ideology overcame it’s inner contradictions.
Suppose the capitalist system manages to create one worldmarket and one company or a high standard of living for the whole planet, shall it tehn have overcome it’s contradictions ? No, because exploitation and surplusvalue shall continue to lead to overproduction. So why capitalism continues to dominate ? Because we continue to accept their ideology. Because our weaknes, capitalism can continue it’s often historical task in an often bloody way. They still have the economical and military power to do so.
While every different group of scientific socialists has it’s own calculations on the economical fitness of the current ruling system, no real alternative way of managing society is beiing put forward. While the bourgeois class and it’s managers and politicians continue to invent more organisation in function of keeping in power; the majority of social or political ‘workers’-organisations, limit themselves mainly to the small and limited economical battles. While the little ‘gains’ of this struggle within the borders of the system try to maintain the hughly different living standards of the different groups of modern proletarians…no organised group of workers not even claims an equal income for everybody in it’s program…and no group explains how a society without a wagesystem and commodity production can produce and distribute in a more or less equal way. Are we afaid to use our imagination ? Do we need the hierarchical discipline and structures of our current economical, social and political rulers ? Are we, the millions who lead the practical day to day live that state, company and family offer us, so brainwashed that we keep on walking in the mill that the bourgeois-media keeps turning for us ?
How can we learn to get more assertive in a proletarian way ?
By taking an intrest in phylosophy, politics, history… By studying our own concrete living conditions where we work and live. By realising that the emotional and pshychological problems we are all confronted with (whether in ourselves or in all our different kinds of relations), are beiing agravated by the current system of production. That’s where real ideology is all about, it’s really a kind of spiritual matter that has nothing to do with the classical ideology of ‘religion’ interpretated in a conservative way, but with combining and connecting all the different kinds of consciousness we came to mention in this text and others. Human beiings can get a ot of energy from beiing conscious about these kind of things…or it can make them sick, because they realise they cannot change the world on their own : ‘workers unite’.
+++MATURITY COUD CHANGE THE WORLD
As I explain in the text ‘a change in attitude’, there are a lot of problems facing our social and economical lives. I already explained a lot of political problems and put forward some solutions for those rather objective areas of life. If you want, I could compare these explanations and solutions once again with those of other individuals or groups or PARTies…but I’m not goiing to do this in this text. Every explanation or solution is PART of the way things evoluate in the course of the real future of mankind that is to be expected. Each view and alternative, whether based on an existing reformistic power or on the possible revolutionary challenges; reflects a certain degree of consciousness, based on material positions in society, as well as on the degree of subjective consciousness we’ve reached : for those who do not understand, I’m talking about less measurable things like solidarity, emotional, psychological …even spiritual consciousness.
Solidarity is the collective as well as individual emotion we need to do our share of the work or our collective, again individual capacity to react and organise in favour of groups of people unther threat of unemployment, war, famine, disaster… . We still are dominated by the kind of ideology that says we should think as individuals, reacting only on our individual intrests. That’s why unions still are so corporatistic and why big strikes for more general demands or manifestations against wars…still have so little impact. That’s why a lot of us need things like money and beiing exploited as a stimulans to make us do any work at all. That’s why absolute hierarchical organisation is still more effective then freely agreed and spontaneous arangements.

+++REVOLUTIONS SO FAR WERE OF A REFORMIST NATURE
In the former century, the 1917-revolution, in what was the beginning of the former Sovjetunion, took the country from a backward capitalist and semi-feodal country on the road to a state-capitalistic economy. The different groups that were the main players leading the developments and changes that farmers and workers or other classes demanded, were already activ in other countries like Germany…(mainly social-democrats) and they would have splits, ends and regroupments upon till today. In the last years of tsarism one could find ones political inspiration in groups like the cades, the social-revolutionaries, the bolsjevics, anarchos… .
Today, some workersgroups claim that capitalism was already decadent at the beginning of the century. In a moral way this is indeed very true. But in an economical way; that is in relation to the technological progres to be made and the production forces that were to be developed, this is not an entirely deepened pointed of view. Since the military and bureaucratic State power proved to be stronger then the coureageous revolts and organisation of the workers, they did not get the opportunity to prove that they could organise and develop the economy as ‘disciplined’ as the bourgeois State and companies could. After each revolution (that was in fact a ‘revolt’), followed a counter-revolt…ending between the first and second worldwar in fascism…as a kind of SuperStatecapitalism. Were the minds already prepared to do away with the wagesystem and the production of commodities (commerce) in those days ?
Since the consciousnss of each social class traduces itself in different degrees of consciousness; there were a lot of different kinds of proletarian parties confronting established parties that were suposed to represent workers. Unity seemed to be and still is impossible on the basis of partydogma’s. No unified program to present the workers had any succes. It could not have been otherwise, because the result of some
evolutions on a certain point in time and place cannot be other then the product of the material and ideological conditions people life unther.
One cannot expect of people having to work 12 hours a day, and having little welfare, that they take an intrest in reading about revolution in an academic way. Nowerdays the bourgeois-system tries to poison our minds with the values of their ideological (often idiotical) way of life…so we would stay as atomised as they would like us to be and to prefend that we get conscious of the fact that in reality we merely are the tools they are using. The way we lead our lives is the way they want us to lead our lives. We are beiing kept conditioned for their aims.
Should we wait for their economy to collaps once more in an unbearable way or should we wait for the moment when the new magical mystery toy of globalism meets massive resistence…or for the moment when people get fed up of stressed working and living conditions…and rise in an organised wy against this all ? Should we wait untill some people do not cling as much to their luxery any more and become activ ?
We, the ones garding the theoretical history, think to much only in terms of whether one is a Leninist, Trotskist, Stalinist…or another ‘ist’ with a familyname befor it. How are we going to intervene in the proces of workers eventually wanting to take power ? Now that we have elaborated our theories and each variety of ideas exist, how are we gooing to regroup ? Points of view can be different and we must keep on writing good articels, but we should be very prudent.
One should be as realistic to aknowledge the fact that for exemple China today is a more modern State then it was in 1927, because the Chinese CP-policy, in spite of it’s numberous mistakes or alliances with the forces of the right at that time, contributed to that proces.
One should be able to say, without beiing insulted that some benefits ; acquired unther the former social experiments in the former USSR or the DDR, were better then the dailly live an increasingly part of their populations have now anno 2001 . Without beiing distrusted, one should be able to say that in times of war , the ‘revolutionary theory of defaitism’ (the war against each nation’s own establishment) was more easy to put into practice in the days of the Russian Tsarism then in fascist occupied Europe.
After all our studying and writing we should become able to put forward our own program to be voted on one day. Afterwards the ones to controle such a program could be apointed by international elections also…no elections where voters can vote on ‘parties’, but international elections on PROJECTS. We have already a lot of concrete propositions on this…maybe you have also. Why wait untill workers liberate themselves on their own and start leadin ‘councils’ ‘democratically’. Will then the majority be , as by a happy coincidence; the most ‘conscious’ part of the proletariat ? I’m afraid not. I’m not a supporter of certain ‘chaos-theories’. Intervening in the class-struggle theoretically is one thing, guiding it in a practical way is another…leading in periods of struggle will prove to be necessary… . But what will we then have to offer ?

+++WORKERS ADMINISTRATIAN AND HIERARCHY VERSUS BOURGEOIS STATE AND BOURGEOIS DEMOCRACY
Folowing a number of discussions going on on the internet and outside it, it seems to me a lot of controverse exists on the question of how a socialist project is to replace the system of exploitation and concurrency.
Every group and all the not-organised individuals have their own ideas on this subject and the way alternatives are to be implemented.
If such a system is to establish itself and wishes to survive, it cannot do without strictly defining the notion ‘proletarian hierarchy’.
According to me, proletarian dictatorship is not the rule of a party or the rule of the ‘democratic centralism’ of councils; or not a coalition between parties; but the coordinated action of the ‘highest EXECUTIVE council of the internationally organised ‘projects’ (1 political legislative project called ‘society’ and 14 practical projects to manage society on a world base).
In a period of revolutionary struggles, legeslative ‘councils’ must come together to debate and decide on a transition program towards an non-capitalist society. To prepare this kind of situation we could already form, and in fact are forming embryonal committees.
Once an agreement on the demands for each project is reached, their international executive organ can organise international elections for or against such a transitional program.
Since that program will be mainly based on the needs of proletarians, such a program shall have a large majority. After the aproval of the program, the councils can organise international elections on a non-party base.
To appoint the responisible dirigents of each project in society, people would be able to give their votes for candidates arranged in one of the 15 projects necessary to manage society. Dirigents must follow the guidelines of the projects and can be replaced if they don’t follow the program, or if they prove to be not ready to manage whatever is to be managed.
In this way the State, as an instrument in keeping capitalism in power, can be replaced by a proletarian hierarchy, capable of providing a real socialist alternative and a mode of functioning for the transition towards socialism …which becomes more needed as years go by.
The 15 projects , needed to manage society in a modern, technocratical way, are : one legislative project, 14 executive projects, all having delegates in the legislative project)
-SOCIETY-project (legislative and juridicial matters : proletarian members from the councils can be candidate. Their can be a delegation from consumer)organisations as well. The project ‘society’ will have to debate on the demands for each project.
A temporary proposition and an exemple of this can be found on the homepage http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/9799
The main, unanswerd question is : ‘can we go directly from a wage-based society towards a wage-less form of organising society ‘ ? Objectively we are ready for this; capitalism and we, the workers, have developed the material conditions for it, but are we ready for such a change, ‘subjectively’ ? We should put up an educational campaign on it…on all the aspects it includes.
The role of ‘money’ in a new non-speculative society, based on purely administrating production and distribution or public services in a first stage; could be reduced to buying food and consumer-goods (their prices based on worldwide standardised production conditions).
The cost of Public Services could be organised as subscriptions taken from our wage befor you get it.

A lot shall depend on what will happen to class-consciousness in its confrontation with the living-conditions to be expected unther a further rule of capitalism (objective factors) A lot shall depend also on our ability to organise an the amount of objection within workers rangs themself.
If Statereformism can keep capitalism goiing in times of depression, and an important number of proletarians, or independents whose livingconditions are effected in a negative way, will resist the proletarians that choose to organise in councils; then all kinds of proletarian propositions must avoid the civil war the bourgeois parts of society will eventually seek.
The executive projects for managing society can be arranged as : work/food/housing/energy/telematics/transport/environment/production/
distribution/safety/money/education/health/relations.
I hope you understood this explanation. I know that different kinds of socialists are trying each to reach their goals in separated ways, basing themselves on different analyses of history. But do we not share the same goals and should we not learn to work together on a realistic an practical base, not just an academic one ?
Wether you have but your believes in reaching the socialist transformation of society by means of bourgeois-democratic elections for propaganda-purposes or whether you are organising on another base; our class needs a program and an alternative way to organise and manage society. In the mean while we (in general) still get the politicians we ‘deserve’, because of our low degree of assertivism and because of the fact we still cling to bourgeois ideology , whether politically or emotionally. You can come over for a discussion.

+++A CHANGE IN ATTITUDE
I wonder what military stratigists are already planning for the future.
Most of the modern developed countries can rely on professional troops.
Since they abolished the ‘civil’ militay duty for young men, they fight their wars from the air. They know that a massive rection against their wars is not evident in these times where their media prepares the minds months before they attack. ‘Humanitary’ Interventions’ for situations they helped to create themselves.
They put Sadam in power. They armed the ‘religious’ lunatics in Afghanistan. They pushed nationalism in the East. They controled the political scene in the middle East and in Africa. They gained and still gain big money producing weapons. They supported one ethnic group against an other.
What are their plans. Will they ‘intervene’ in Russia once the proces of every kind of desintegration shall accelerate and shall threaten their newly found ‘colony’ ? They surely continue to destabilize their economical concurrents like China, using the trick of ‘bourgeois democracy’ again; or the ‘red danger’.
They and all the ones that serve their system that fools us day in day out. They project their images of beiing rich and wealthy into our minds and oblige us to go and work to purchase a happy life, matching up to their standards. They put in the minds of millions that ‘one exists more if one can buy more’ They make us believe that working like robots adds to our personal development. They convinced us that producing goods is only possible if huge profits can be made. With the help of ‘our’ unions they teach us that lay-offs are indispensable to ‘survive’ .
They try to make some of their statements as the most natural order of things; so that ‘s why they dare defend the use of cheap medecins against Aids in South Africa for exemple. They pay their supermanagers and our footballplayers millions a year. Their States keep us well divided, according to our ‘place’ in the system. But still they keep saying we are all so equal.
Why do we KEEP PUTTING UP with this ? We vote, they stay in power, ‘liberalising the world’ more and more. State-related jobs keep some of us in a sort of obedience, the ones who oppose themselves put themselves out of a job, just like in private enterprises. We work, they live their lives on the profits we make. We keep on accepting their kind of hierarchy instead of inventing and imposing our own. Their system stays in place because of it’s hierarchical cohesion. Some of us believe that a system of their own can do without hierarchy; but even equality cannot function without it. The political hierarchy we must work towards to, must
be a hierarchy that is based upon the dirigents of an economical and social program. If one day council all around the world shall organise elections, we should be able to first say yes to a global revolutionary program and then elect the ones guiding the different projects of society. The ones delegated by the worldcouncil and the ones internationally elected on the lists of the projects should be accepted as the highest hierarchy.
When ever there are indications that someone doesn’t forfill it’s responsabilities, according to what he or she was put in charge for, a majority of workers in a company , a project or council, could ask for that persons removal. ALL THESE TEXTS RESULTED IN http://bloggen.be/conscience2008 a worldwide referendum for program and project elections

February 6, 2010. Tags: , , , , , . politics. Leave a comment.

how to prevent wall street 1929

Wall Street 1929-bis ? No way !

How to prevent a second Wall Street 1929-bis ?
Why the worldeconomy doesn’t have to collapse for the next two decades.
Billions of money has disapeared in the skys of speculation.
Worldwide that money did not found it’s way in the consumption-chain.
Governements should have taxed the big fortunes of big speculators in a just way.
That money should have gone to the ones that are in need of it.
The money that is wasted on arms and wars should go to help people in areas
that are unther the influence of extreme fanatic rulers…let us give them tractors with
that money or help them build a descend infrastructure…instead of making war.
By doiing so, investors, independents and workers would benefit.
The real economy is not the speculative economy.
The speculative economy has devastated the real value of money.
The political world needs international regulation.
People in parties and unions should have a debate on this and
put pressure on their governements.

Wanting unlimeted profits without investing because not enough consumption,
the economy goes in a recession, because we are living in a system that is based on continous growth. Now is the time for those big capitalists to prove that professor Marx was wrong on a few points.
Will they temper their greed ? Or are we living in a system based on greed ?
It’s all a question of evoluating to a more stable world or not. We must put some political demands forward, not only to the president of the United States, but to the leaders of Europe, Rusia, China and the rest of the world as well. They refuse to conformise trade between rich and poor nations.
They keep on producing to much arms for the military. They refuse to introduce the same production-conditions, paying a carmaker in Europe…more then one in other places. They refuse to implement a European kind of social security(now unther attack in Europe). They make economical war. In fact they still have the same consciousness as the dukes or kings of the middelages who lived on taxes befor entering the citygates…why maintaining economical borders ? Once again because of the greedy who do not care about the number of suicidal Indian farmers and a lot more.We must change all this in order to give evolution it’s full meaning.
Octo
http://filosofischverzet.skynetblogs.be philosophical resistance belgium alternative : http://bloggen.be/conscience2008

February 6, 2010. politics. Leave a comment.

political theory number one

22-03-2008
POLTICAL THEORY NUMBER ONE

-first law of politics : to understand politics, take a look what’s happening in your family, village, city,country, the world… disputes begin with ‘that’s mine, that’s ours, we want that, they have that, they tax to little or to much, this is to cheap or they sell to expensive, pay me to little…he doesn’t work as much as she or he….the world needs more equality, starting by onesself

February 6, 2010. politics. Leave a comment.